Primary Navigation
Beyond the White Man's Burden
While Rajiv Shah's appointment to head USAID initially met with praise, more pessimistic voices are now piping up about what his appointment means for the future of the agency. Foreign Policy has a particularly good article, which suggests that the way in which Shah's role is structured could portend a significantly dismished role for USAID. FP editor Annie Lowrey notes that Shah may not receive the designation of deputy secretary of state, which means he would not report directly to Secretary Clinton. Instead, word is that Clinton wants him to report to Jack Lew, the deputy secretary of state for management and resources. Without a direct line to the Secretary, Shah's influence is likely to be severely hampered. Of course, closer ties with the Secretary could also signal that USAID will be further integrated into State, frustrating hopes that USAID may be restored as a truly independent agency.
Either way, the future of USAID certainly is hanging in the balance, with the State Department, the White House and Congress all undertaking reviews of the country's foreign assistance programs. Shah is one of the few development practitioners brave enough to step into a job with an unclear mandate and future. His job could turn out to be a disappointment - or a major opportunity.
Would you like to comment?
You must be a member. Sign In if you are already a member.
Contributors
Recently Discussed
- U.N. to create new body on women'...
6 months ago - What (pregnant) women want
6 months ago - AIDS: The leading cause of death an...
6 months ago - Can aid really win hearts and minds...
6 months ago - USAID: A national security agency?
6 months ago - US lifts travel ban on HIV-positive...
6 months ago - Obama administration renews U.S. co...
6 months ago - Speculating on the future of USAID
7 months ago - U.S. contributes to corruption in A...
8 months ago - Round Up: Responses to the Sudan Po...
9 months ago
Recent Posts
- International Violence Against...
5 months ago - Haiti: How to move forward wit...
6 months ago - Top UN humanitarian discusses ...
6 months ago - Aid flow picks up in Haiti but...
6 months ago - Round-up on Haiti
6 months ago - Reconstructing Haiti: Looking ...
6 months ago - Obama administration renews U....
6 months ago - US lifts travel ban on HIV-pos...
6 months ago - U.N.-backed military offensive...
6 months ago - Using sticks and carrots with ...
7 months ago
Page Options
1 Comment
What does this mean for US development policies, though? Will it be marginalized as an issue by the Obama administration? Will it be controlled elsewhere? Will there be a change in how aid and development is handled in the US? How does this relate to the QDDR? No offence, but this doesn't tell us much...and I personally don't really care about Shah's personal career.